# How to easily improve your Sharpe ratio (in no time)

Systematic risk affects the entire market and impacts the Sharpe ratio. Any trading strategy must consider the impact of systematic risk. While a strategy must involve some risk to make money, systematic risk cannot be diversified away.

So, we need to build a hedge to get rid of it.

By hedging systematic risk, we can better protect our strategies and ultimately outperform the market.

After having taught 1,000+ in my course, I can say with confidence most people do not hedge. Or if they do, it’s ineffective.

By reading today’s newsletter, you’ll see how an effective hedge can improve performance.

Let’s go!

## How to easily improve your Sharpe ratio (in no time)

The value of a trading strategy is its ability to deliver good risk-adjusted returns measured by the Sharpe Ratio. In Richard Grinold’s “The Fundamental Law of Active Management,” the Sharpe Ratio can be thought of in two components: skill and breadth. Skill is measured by the Information Coefficient (IC). Breadth is measured by the number of independent trades.

Higher breadth, when combined with skill, increases the potential for good risk-adjusted returns.

By hedging systematic risk, we can increase the number of independent bets and improve breadth. This increase in breadth leads to better performance and higher returns. That’s why managing systematic risk is important for optimizing the Sharpe Ratio.

Let’s see how it works.

### Imports and set up

We’ll use yFinance for asset data and statsmodels for simple regression. Let’s import the libraries.

```import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import statsmodels.api as sm
import yfinance as yf
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
```

In this analysis, we’ll use three financial stocks and three energy stocks. You can replace these with your own portfolio.

```tickers = ["WFC", "JPM", "USB", "XOM", "VLO", "SLB"]
returns = data.pct_change().dropna()

fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(ncols=2)
fig.tight_layout()
corr = returns.corr()
left = data.plot(ax=ax1)
right = sns.heatmap(
corr, ax=ax2, vmin=-1, vmax=1,
xticklabels=tickers, yticklabels=tickers
)
```

The result is two plots. The first shows the historic stock price. The second shows the correlation matrix.

The average pairwise correlation across the six assets in our portfolio is 0.628. This is quite high and restricts our ability to make independent bets.

### Hedging systematic sector risk

Now let’s run the analysis again with ETFs that represent the financial sector, energy sector, and overall market.

```market_symbols = ["XLF", "SPY", "XLE"]
sector_1_stocks = ["WFC", "JPM", "USB"]
sector_2_stocks = ["XOM", "VLO", "SLB"]

tickers = market_symbols + sector_1_stocks + sector_2_stocks
returns = price.pct_change().dropna()
```

This code repeats the process we did before including the ETFs representing our sectors. Next, we do some DataFrame manipulation to isolate the stock returns.

```market_returns = returns["SPY"]
sector_1_returns = returns["XLF"]
sector_2_returns = returns["XLE"]

stock_returns = returns.drop(market_symbols, axis=1)
residuals_market = stock_returns.copy() * 0.0
residuals = stock_returns.copy() * 0.0
```

Note the two DataFrames, `residuals_market` and `residuals`, which are copies of `stock_returns` but filled with zeros. We’ll use these next. In this code, we begin to isolate the specific returns of stocks by removing the effects of broader market movements and sector influences.

The sector return and the market return are themselves highly correlated. As such, you cannot do a multivariate regression due to multicollinearity.

To hedge against both the market and a given security’s sector, you first estimate the market beta residuals and then calculate the sector beta on those residuals.

```def ols_residual(y, x):
results = sm.OLS(y, x).fit()
return results.resid

sector_1_excess = ols_residual(sector_1_returns, market_returns)
sector_2_excess = ols_residual(sector_2_returns, market_returns)

for stock in sector_1_stocks:
residuals_market[stock] = ols_residual(returns[stock], market_returns)
residuals[stock] = ols_residual(residuals_market[stock], sector_1_excess)

for stock in sector_2_stocks:
residuals_market[stock] = ols_residual(returns[stock], market_returns)
residuals[stock] = ols_residual(residuals_market[stock], sector_2_excess)
```

The function `ols_residual` calculates the residuals from an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression of `y` on **`x. This`**represents the portion of `y` not explained by `x`. The variables `sector_1_excess` and `sector_2_excess` store the excess returns of two sectors over the market returns.

The loops iterate over stocks in each sector. First, we remove the market influence from each stock’s returns and then remove the sector influence. This double regression isolates the idiosyncratic returns of each stock to make sure the residuals represent independent bets.

Finally, we can plot the residuals and test the correlation of the hedged portfolio.

```fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(ncols=2)
fig.tight_layout()
corr = residuals.corr()
left = (1 + residuals).cumprod().plot(ax=ax1)
right = sns.heatmap(
corr,
ax=ax2,
fmt="d",
vmin=-1,
vmax=1,
xticklabels=residuals.columns,
yticklabels=residuals.columns,
)
```

The result is two plots. The first shows the historic residuals. The second shows the correlation matrix.

The average pairwise correlation across the six assets in our portfolio is 0.024. The sector hedge brought down the correlation between our bets to close to zero.

We’ll use the “semi-generalized fundamental law of active management” to calculate breadth. This ideas is from David Buckle’s work, “How to calculate breadth: An evolution of the fundamental law of active portfolio management,” published in the Journal of Asset Management in 2003.

```def buckle_BR_const(N, rho):
return N/(1 + rho*(N - 1))

corr = np.linspace(start=0, stop=1.0, num=500)
plt.plot(corr, buckle_BR_const(6, corr))
plt.xlabel('Forecast Correlation');
```

The key takeaway for us is a closed-form calculation of effective breadth based on the correlation between bets. The result is a chart that shows us the effective breadth for each level of forecasted correlation.

We see that at a correlation 0.628, we are effectively making only approximately one bet. When we add the sector hedge, we get close to zero correlation, and in this case the number of bets equals the number of assets, six.

As a next step, try rerunning this analysis with your own portfolio. Remember that due to commissions, we’ll never get a perfect hedge. You can usually get better hedges with relative value or pairs trading strategies. If you’re running a portfolio however, using a sector-based hedging strategy is a great start.